top of page

Egypt: The Suspicious Scene-The Delay in Forming the Government and the Indifference of the Egyptians

AI Generated illustration of Sad looking Egyptians
AI Generated illustration of Sad looking Egyptians

By: Ahmed Fathi

New York : In a move that raised many questions, Mostafa Madbouly’s government resigned on June 3, following President Sisi's directive for him to form a new government composed of technocrats to confront the myriad challenges plaguing the country. Foremost among these challenges is the stifling economic crisis that has permeated all aspects of Egyptians’ lives. Amid an intense heatwave, citizens are enduring power outages due to the non-operation of power plants, a consequence of the lack of funds needed to purchase gas.

**A Suspicious Delay**

Three weeks have passed since this resignation, yet as of June 25, the formation of the new government remains unannounced. Only rumors circulate about potential candidates for ministerial positions. This delay raises significant concern, particularly given Egypt's autocratic regime, which does not require the prolonged negotiations characteristic of democratic nations with party pluralism. In Egypt, such processes are typically swift, adhering to the longstanding principle of prioritizing trust over experience, a norm that has been in place since 1952.

**People's Apathy and Loss of Confidence**

Curiously, the Egyptian public appears indifferent to the news of the government’s resignation and the ensuing consultations, as if the matter is of no consequence to them. This apathy stems from a profound loss of confidence in the current system and its ability to address the country's pressing issues. With characteristic Egyptian cynicism, the current situation is being compared to the eras of Mubarak, Sadat, and Abdel Nasser, when new governments were formed and sworn in either on the same day or the next.

**Questions About the Delayed Formation**

The delay in forming the government prompts several critical questions: Has the regime opted to leave matters in limbo due to the public's lack of interest? Or is it struggling to find ministers willing to serve during this tumultuous period? In autocratic regimes, government dissolution typically occurs with a ready list of candidates for the new administration. However, the decision to dissolve the government appears to have been made impulsively, without adequate planning or preparation, underscoring the marginal role of ministers in shaping public policies.

**The Repercussions of the Delay on the General Situation**

Egypt cannot afford further improvisation or the perception that its citizens are being treated as if they were a group of fools. The current circumstances may precipitate a popular uprising if the regime continues to disregard the real crises and fails to take serious, decisive action. The Egyptian Street is on the brink of explosion, and the leadership must recognize the gravity of the situation and act accordingly before it is too late.

**Required Steps**

To address these challenges, the regime must expedite and transparently form a new government comprising capable individuals who can tackle economic and service crises. This new government should develop clear, concrete plans to improve living conditions and rebuild trust with the Egyptian people.

In conclusion, the present situation demands neither delay nor improvisation. It requires wise, mature leadership and well-considered decisions to prevent further deterioration and a potential popular explosion.


bottom of page