Analysis: Libya- Security Council Rhetoric vs. Ground Realities
- Ahmed Fathi
- 6 days ago
- 4 min read
By Ahmed Fathi
UNHQ, NEW YORK — The United Nations Security Council issued a rare, unified press statement late Saturday, May 17, expressing “deep concern” over a surge in violence in Tripoli, where recent armed clashes have resulted in civilian deaths and deepened fears of a return to full-scale conflict in Libya.
The statement underscores the growing international alarm over the deteriorating security situation in the Libyan capital. In carefully worded diplomatic language, Council members called on “all parties to protect civilians” and demanded accountability for those responsible for attacks against non-combatants.
While the Council welcomed reports of agreed truces, it also stressed that these ceasefires must be “unconditionally respected,” and called for the implementation of a permanent ceasefire agreement—an elusive goal that has remained out of reach since the collapse of momentum following the 2020 Berlin Conference roadmap.
That effort—hailed at the time as a turning point—sought to unite Libya’s divided political and security institutions and lay the groundwork for national elections. Instead, it fell victim to the same forces that have plagued Libya since the fall of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011: a fractured state, militia dominance, and relentless foreign interference.
Libya’s Conflict Landscape and UNSMIL’s Struggle for Relevance
The recent surge in violence in Tripoli did not emerge in a vacuum. It is the latest episode in a long-running, low-grade conflict that has transformed the Libyan capital into a patchwork of territories controlled by powerful militias, many of whom operate with formal affiliations to the government but wield independent authority.
Recent Clashes and Key Factions
The latest fighting has involved three of Tripoli’s most powerful groups:
Radaa – Special Deterrence Forces (قوة الردع الخاصة): An Islamist-leaning force that operates prisons, controls parts of Mitiga Airport, and has long acted as a parallel police and intelligence agency. Though technically subordinate to the Ministry of Interior, it functions as a quasi-state entity.
Stability Support Apparatus (جهاز دعم الاستقرار): A hybrid security force with deep tribal and political backing, often accused of extortion, illegal detentions, and targeted violence. It operates under an official mandate, but its loyalty lies more with internal networks than with state institutions.
444th Combat Brigade (اللواء 444 قتال): Initially established to bring order to southern Tripoli, the brigade has become increasingly autonomous, engaging in turf wars over strategic zones and checkpoints.
According to hospital sources, at least 17 civilians have been killed, and more than 40 injured in the latest clashes. However, the true toll is likely higher, as access to some neighborhoods has been cut off entirely due to fighting.
UNSMIL’s Mandate – Undermined and Under Fire
The United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) was launched in 2011 with the promise of helping the country transition to a stable, democratic post-Gaddafi future. In the years since, that mandate has been repeatedly stretched, rewritten, and undermined.
While UNSMIL was pivotal in negotiating the October 2020 ceasefire between Libya’s eastern and western factions, its role has diminished significantly. The December 2021 national elections—intended to restore political legitimacy through the ballot box—collapsed under the weight of unresolved legal questions, candidate controversies, and militia intimidation.
Special Representative Abdoulaye Bathily, appointed by Secretary-General António Guterres, has struggled to revive the process. His attempts to initiate inclusive dialogue have been met with lukewarm cooperation, and at times outright resistance, from domestic factions and their foreign backers.
The oft-repeated call for military and institutional unification remains a rhetorical flourish rather than an actionable plan. Libya remains bifurcated: the east under General Khalifa Haftar’s Libyan National Army (LNA), and the west under the Tripoli-based Government of National Unity (GNU)—each with its own security infrastructure and foreign sponsors.
Foreign Influence and Proxy Control
Despite Security Council affirmations of Libya’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, the conflict remains intensely internationalized. Competing regional and global actors have turned Libya into a theater for proxy confrontation, prolonging instability and obstructing meaningful peace.
Russia, through its Wagner-linked contractors, maintains a hardened presence in eastern Libya, offering logistical and combat support to Haftar’s forces. The Kremlin views Libya as part of its strategic outreach across North Africa and the Sahel.
Turkey maintains troops in Tripoli and Misrata under formal defense agreements with the GNU. Ankara’s military drones and advisors were decisive in reversing Haftar’s 2019–2020 offensive on Tripoli.
Egypt and the UAE provide intelligence, funding, and military backing to Haftar’s LNA. Both countries view the Muslim Brotherhood influence in the GNU and Tripoli-aligned militias as a regional threat.
Algeria, while more restrained, plays a quiet counterbalancing role—supporting diplomatic solutions and maintaining border security to prevent jihadist spillover.
Security Council Rhetoric vs. Ground Realities
In its Saturday statement, the Security Council reaffirmed support for a “Libyan-led and Libyan-owned” process. Yet critics argue that such language amounts to little more than diplomatic window dressing—especially when key spoilers are never named, and no enforcement mechanisms are proposed.
The failure to confront or sanction the external actors prolonging Libya’s instability undermines the Council’s credibility. Likewise, the call for institutional unification rings hollow in a capital where rival armed groups operate with impunity, nominally under state banners but functionally independent.
The Council’s avoidance of naming responsible actors—whether internal warlords or external enablers—highlights a deeper problem: a fear of offending vested interests, even as Libya’s sovereignty disintegrates in plain view.
A Crossroads for Libya—and for the UN’s Credibility
Libya today sits at a dangerous crossroads. With Tripoli teetering between uneasy ceasefires and full-blown conflict, and with UNSMIL increasingly sidelined, the risk of fragmentation is rising fast.
The political vacuum, the economic collapse, the proliferation of weapons, and the entrenchment of foreign-sponsored factions create conditions ripe for renewed civil war. For the Libyan people—already exhausted by over a decade of upheaval—hope is evaporating.
But this is not just a Libyan tragedy. It is a test of the UN’s ability to function in a multipolar, militarized world. If the Security Council continues to speak in euphemisms while militias redraw city blocks and foreign drones circle above, it risks becoming a spectator to a slow-motion collapse.
To make a difference, the Council must do more than issue statements. It must impose consequences—on both domestic spoilers and foreign patrons—and support UNSMIL with real leverage. Anything less is complicity cloaked in diplomacy.
© ATN News Service. All rights reserved. For syndication or reprint permissions, please contact us.
Comentários